For project sponsors
Submit your project. AfCEN records it, screens it, scores it, and routes it. If it is ready for investors, it appears on the public opportunities board.
↓Draft → Intake → Gate 1 → Scoring → Gate 2 → Road A or BThe pipeline
AfCEN Deal Rooms work in two directions. Project sponsors submit their projects, which are assessed, scored, and routed through a disciplined gate process. Investors browse the projects that reach the market track, register, clear onboarding and KYC, and access increasing detail under NDA — from a public teaser to a full data room.
Submit your project. AfCEN records it, screens it, scores it, and routes it. If it is ready for investors, it appears on the public opportunities board.
↓Draft → Intake → Gate 1 → Scoring → Gate 2 → Road A or BBrowse opportunities publicly. Register, clear KYC and NDA, and unlock increasing detail — from indicative bands to full project documents.
↓Browse → Register → KYC + NDA → Qualified brief → Data roomA project enters as a draft and exits on a road. Six steps, in order, each one refusing rather than guessing when it lacks what it needs. The diagram below shows the whole journey.
A project is recorded — its name, sponsor, country, sector, pillar, stage, and how much capital it needs. Supporting documents can be attached and tagged.
The project sits in draft. Nothing has judged it yet. The record can be edited as many times as needed before intake.
The work of getting the record complete enough to be screened. Three yes/no judgements must be recorded by a person: is the documentation sufficient, is the project politically and reputationally acceptable, and is there a plausible investor or technical-assistance pathway.
An unanswered question is not a pass. Leaving one blank blocks Gate 1 exactly as firmly as answering no to the first one.
The system reads the project and returns one of four outcomes with the reasons attached: eligible, needs intake completion, technical-assistance only, or reject and archive.
Re-screening is expected, not exceptional. A project that comes back as needs intake completion is meant to be completed and screened again.
Only projects that came back eligible can be scored. An assessor grades the project against its pillar's model — either weighted criteria producing a 0–100 composite, or a maturity ladder for agribusiness.
Every score is a new version, never an overwrite. Re-scoring appends. The full history is retained and readable.
Gate 2 reads the project's current assessment and decides which of two roads it belongs on. It is the only thing in the system that assigns a road.
Re-running Gate 2 on an already-routed project re-derives the decision from its current assessment — which is what makes re-scoring able to move a project from one road to the other.
Road A is preparation — gaps are identified against the pillar model and a draft Terms of Reference can be generated for each gap. Road B is the market track — the project is shown to investors through three tiers of access.
A project can move from Road A to Road B. Re-scoring changes the assessment, and Gate 2 re-derives the road from the new score. Nothing is locked.
Gate 1 is not a score. It is a list of named checks evaluated in strict order, and the first one that trips decides the outcome.
The project is politically or reputationally unacceptable, or has no plausible pathway. These cannot be fixed by supplying more data.
A mandatory field is missing, or one of the three screening questions is unanswered. The project goes back to intake.
The project is real and acceptable, but its capital need is below the infrastructure-scale threshold. It routes to TA rather than scoring.
Everything passed. The project is cleared for readiness scoring and moves to the next step.
Gate 2 reads the project's score and assigns it to one of two roads. It is the only thing in the system that assigns a road.
For projects not yet ready for investors. The system identifies gaps against the pillar model and a draft Terms of Reference can be generated for each gap — what needs doing, to close which gap, for which project.
For projects ready to be shown to investors. Three layers of access: a public teaser, a qualified brief, and a data room. Each layer requires more clearance than the one before it.
The more you are cleared for, the more you see. The diagram below shows the three levels — what each one reveals, and what AfCEN requires before it opens.
Public. No account, no NDA. Bands only — a capital band, never a figure; no sponsor identity; no documents.
Requires the investor to be onboarded, KYC clear and unexpired, and a platform NDA executed. Exact figures, sponsor identity, full narrative.
Everything in Tier 2, plus a project-specific NDA and the sponsor's recorded approval for this investor on this project. Documents, models, contracts.
An investor arrives with no account and leaves with a data room. Five steps, each one unlocking more detail than the last.
Anyone can browse the public opportunities board — no account, no login. Each project shows its name, country, sector, pillar, and indicative capital and readiness bands.
What you see is a Tier 1 teaser: enough to decide whether a project is worth asking about, and not enough to be a data room. Exact figures and sponsor identity are not shown.
Create an investor account. You provide your name, email, and the investing entity you represent. The account exists immediately but is not yet cleared.
Registration is the gate between browsing and access. Until AfCEN completes onboarding, no project detail beyond the public teaser is available to the account.
AfCEN verifies the investor — legal entity, jurisdiction, regulatory status, beneficial ownership, and KYC/AML checks. A platform-level NDA is executed.
This is what unlocks Tier 2. KYC has an expiry date — a check cleared two years ago is not cleared now, and an expired status blocks access until it is renewed.
With KYC clear and the platform NDA executed, the investor sees the qualified brief — exact financial figures, the sponsor's identity, and the full project narrative.
This is the second layer of access. It is still not the data room. Documents, models, and contracts remain behind the next gate.
The deepest layer. Requires a project-specific NDA and the sponsor's recorded approval for this investor on this specific project. Full documents, financial models, contracts, and studies.
Access is per project, not blanket. The sponsor decides who enters their data room, and AfCEN records that decision — it is not assumed.